Group Email Manager

login signup
Re: Param ordering; < and <= felix (22 Jul 2002 18:45 UTC)
Almost OT, < and <= Ben Goetter (in the field) (22 Jul 2002 20:06 UTC)
Re: Almost OT, < and <= David Feuer (22 Jul 2002 22:21 UTC)
RE: Almost OT, < and <= Ben Goetter (in the field) (23 Jul 2002 09:25 UTC)
RE: Almost OT, < and <= David Feuer (23 Jul 2002 14:28 UTC)
Re: Almost OT, < and <= felix (23 Jul 2002 07:30 UTC)
RE: Almost OT, < and <= Ben Goetter (in the field) (23 Jul 2002 08:27 UTC)
Re: Almost OT, < and <= Marc Feeley (25 Jul 2002 23:43 UTC)
RE: Almost OT, < and <= Ben Goetter (26 Jul 2002 02:47 UTC)
RE: Almost OT, < and <= Ben Goetter (in the field) 23 Jul 2002 08:32 UTC 
> On which platforms might it matter, then?

MIPS, FPGA; most bignum impls.  For a sufficiently small definition
of "matter."

> Can you give a code- example

Either a wasted cycle bothers you, or else it doesn't bother you.

Never mind the poor wasted electrons feeding the gates for those
extra microcoded flag bit tests.  Alas!