|
Finally clauses
Tony Garnock-Jones
(09 Aug 2002 14:05 UTC)
|
|
Re: Finally clauses Dave Mason (09 Aug 2002 14:58 UTC)
|
|
Re: Finally clauses
Richard Kelsey
(09 Aug 2002 23:28 UTC)
|
|
Re: Finally clauses
Tony Garnock-Jones
(12 Aug 2002 11:24 UTC)
|
|
Re: Finally clauses
Richard Kelsey
(13 Aug 2002 00:48 UTC)
|
|
Re: Finally clauses
Tony Garnock-Jones
(13 Aug 2002 17:35 UTC)
|
|
Re: Finally clauses
Richard Kelsey
(15 Aug 2002 01:47 UTC)
|
|
Re: Finally clauses
Tony Garnock-Jones
(15 Aug 2002 11:11 UTC)
|
|
Re: Finally clauses
bear
(15 Aug 2002 15:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: Finally clauses
sperber@xxxxxx
(29 Aug 2002 08:08 UTC)
|
|
Re: Finally clauses
bear
(01 Sep 2002 20:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: Finally clauses
Richard Kelsey
(01 Sep 2002 22:22 UTC)
|
|
Re: Finally clauses
bear
(04 Sep 2002 03:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: Finally clauses
Richard Kelsey
(04 Sep 2002 06:55 UTC)
|
Re: Finally clauses Dave Mason 09 Aug 2002 14:58 UTC
I'd add my vote for finally, too. Even if it doesn't solve all the world's problems, it solves enough of them to be very handy. And I realize I could wrap the try/catch in a dynamic-wind, but it seems rather nicely related to try/catch and exceptions. ../Dave