"Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]" wrote:
>
> >>>>> "felix" == felixundduni  <felix> writes:
>
> felix> Is there a particular reason why condition types are prefixed
> felix> with "&"?
>
> Uh, yeah, so that they are recognizable as condition types.
>
> felix> I find this rather ugly. One just has to take a look at PLT's
> felix> units/signatures to see a how such syntactical conventions can
> felix> go totally haywire.
>
> Beauty is in the eye of the beholder; I rather like PLT's naming
> conventions.  Can you be more specific as to what you mean by "go
> totally haywire"?  Alternative suggestions?

I find all those @'s and ^'s highly offensive. It breaks the flow
and makes the code less readable (IMHO). YMMV of course.

I like the names proposed by Mr. Stone.

felix