Re: supporting multi argument commandline arguments
sperber@xxxxxx 26 Sep 2002 14:12 UTC
>>>>> "Anthony" == Anthony Carrico <xxxxxx@memebeam.org> writes:
Anthony> On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Robert Bruce Findler wrote:
>> Right -- I did see that there, and I posted on an internal PLT mailing
>> list where I met with opposition to requiring the extra quotes:
Anthony> >
>> -L"first-arg second-arg"
>> --long-name="first-arg second-arg"
Anthony> >
>> Oh well.
Anthony> I feel for you, I've heard private support for the opposite position off
Anthony> this list too. If anyone is passionate about this issue, speak up on this
Anthony> list please.
I feel somewhat passionately for GNU/POSIX-style command-line
processing. After a few weeks' absence from PLT Scheme, I usually
have to read the docs to actually believe they've done this
differently from everyone else. I find PLT's way of doing things
unnecessarily hard to remember.
If the quotes don't pacify the opposition, how-about
--long-name=first-arg,second-arg
or something?
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla