Re: cmdline.ss library in PLT Anthony Carrico (24 Sep 2002 15:23 UTC)
Re: cmdline.ss library in PLT Robert Bruce Findler (24 Sep 2002 15:37 UTC)
Re: cmdline.ss library in PLT Anthony Carrico (24 Sep 2002 16:46 UTC)
Re: cmdline.ss library in PLT Robert Bruce Findler (24 Sep 2002 17:07 UTC)
Re: cmdline.ss library in PLT Anthony Carrico (25 Sep 2002 14:34 UTC)
Re: cmdline.ss library in PLT Anthony Carrico (25 Sep 2002 15:13 UTC)
Re: cmdline.ss library in PLT Robert Bruce Findler (25 Sep 2002 16:07 UTC)

Re: cmdline.ss library in PLT Robert Bruce Findler 25 Sep 2002 16:07 UTC

At Wed, 25 Sep 2002 11:15:47 -0400 (EDT), Anthony Carrico wrote:
> Given this existing idiom, is it worth upsetting the status quo with a new
> feature? Would it confuse application users, who probably expect the old
> idiom?

Yes, all good points. the cmdline.ss library avoids this problem by
requiring spaces:

  -xall

is the same as

  -x -a -l -l

not the same as

  -x all

regardless of the comandline specification.

Also, it doesn't use the

  --long-name=x

it still uses spaces, ie:

  --long-name x

so that would be further incompatability.

Robby