Re: Much simpler leak-free implementation possible? Andre van Tonder (18 Aug 2003 20:10 UTC)
Re: Much simpler leak-free implementation possible? Phil Bewig (19 Aug 2003 07:33 UTC)

Re: Much simpler leak-free implementation possible? Phil Bewig 19 Aug 2003 07:33 UTC

On Monday, August 18, 2003 3:10 PM, Andre van Tonder [SMTP:xxxxxx@het.brown.edu] wrote:
> Are you using the definition?
>
>   (define from0
>      (let loop ((x 0))
>        (stream-delay
>          (stream-cons x (loop (+ x 1))))))
>
Yes.

Phil