Re: Much simpler leak-free implementation possible?
Andre van Tonder 29 Aug 2003 00:04 UTC
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Andre van Tonder wrote:
> For what it's worth, I have adapted the CPS-style solution to a direct-style
> delay and force (below), that has the correct tail call behavior and should
> work well in Schemes with an efficient implementation of call/cc
I withdraw this. Found a bug (sorry)...