Re: Much simpler leak-free implementation possible? Andre van Tonder (28 Aug 2003 01:09 UTC)
Re: Much simpler leak-free implementation possible? Andre van Tonder (29 Aug 2003 00:04 UTC)

Re: Much simpler leak-free implementation possible? Andre van Tonder 29 Aug 2003 00:04 UTC

On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Andre van Tonder wrote:

> For what it's worth, I have adapted the CPS-style solution to a direct-style
> delay and force (below), that has the correct tail call behavior and should
> work well in Schemes with an efficient implementation of call/cc

I withdraw this.  Found a bug (sorry)...