Re: AW: AW: AW: Several comments tb@xxxxxx 10 Apr 2003 17:02 UTC
"Michael Burschik" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes: > Probably, I'm just too conservative. Anyway, I retract any objections > against defining the predicates vector-empty? and vector-nonempty?. My reason for wanting those functions is not because I imagine gobs of code that uses empty vectors. Maybe a little, but you are quite right that it's rare. Rather, I think as much as possible the vector functions and the list functions should be the same set and have the same names, except where it just doesn't make any sense at all.