(Previous discussion continued)
Re: AW: AW: AW: Several comments tb@xxxxxx 10 Apr 2003 17:02 UTC

Re: AW: AW: AW: Several comments tb@xxxxxx 10 Apr 2003 17:02 UTC

"Michael Burschik" <xxxxxx@lotto-berlin.de> writes:

> Probably, I'm just too conservative. Anyway, I retract any objections
> against defining the predicates vector-empty? and vector-nonempty?.

My reason for wanting those functions is not because I imagine gobs of
code that uses empty vectors.  Maybe a little, but you are quite right
that it's rare.

Rather, I think as much as possible the vector functions and the list
functions should be the same set and have the same names, except where
it just doesn't make any sense at all.