On Wednesday, April 16, 2003, at 07:08 PM, Per Bothner wrote:
> I agree.  I missed the justification for including association
> vectors.  Why would anyone ever use such a data structure?  If
> you really want it, use a vector of pairs, but even then it should
> be rare enough that there is no need to standardize such
> trivial and rarely-used functions.

You all have good points that far supersede the only reason I kept them
in
there (and I didn't really support keeping them in there, either).
Unless
anyone has any major objections now, I'll be removing them in a day or
two.