Re: Function name: concatentate? tb@xxxxxx 08 Apr 2003 18:45 UTC

Taylor Campbell <xxxxxx@evdev.ath.cx> writes:

> Yes, it should be VECTOR-CONCATENATE.  In fact, I've fixed that
> already, but the
> document just hasn't been updated yet.

Aww, if Unix can have "creat", can't Scheme have "concatentate"?