Re: Function name: concatentate?
tb@xxxxxx 08 Apr 2003 18:45 UTC
Taylor Campbell <xxxxxx@evdev.ath.cx> writes:
> Yes, it should be VECTOR-CONCATENATE. In fact, I've fixed that
> already, but the
> document just hasn't been updated yet.
Aww, if Unix can have "creat", can't Scheme have "concatentate"?