xxxxxx@freenetproject.org wrote:
> First, if we are to use collection-fold-keys-increasing, it makes sense
> that collection-fold-left is renamed to collection-fold-increasing as
> well.
>
> Second, Is there any objection to adding the procedures collection-fold
> and collection-fold-keys as synonyms for collection-fold-increasing and
> collection-fold-keys-increasing respectively?

I'm skeptical of both changes.  The fold concept is spatial (thus
addressing unordered collections) and increasing/decreasing is
explicitly ordered.

And what about ordered vs unordered key enumeration?  Are you really
saying ordered key enumeration is the only option?

Jim
--
"I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they fly by."
-- Douglas Adams