xxxxxx@freenetproject.org wrote:
> This is a fallacious argument .... Then define it in another SRFI ....
> You have made some dire warnings without evidence ....

See, you're still not listening. You're still too busy rationalizing why
it's OK to ignore these issues. If you're going to brush off detailed
analyses as "not evidence," what's the point in making them anymore?
Have fun with your design doc -- I'm outta here.
--
Bradd W. Szonye
http://www.szonye.com/bradd