[oleg@pobox.com: Interface view of dictionaries] scgmille@xxxxxx (28 Oct 2003 01:28 UTC)
Re: [oleg@pobox.com: Interface view of dictionaries] Bradd W. Szonye (28 Oct 2003 04:25 UTC)
Re: [oleg@pobox.com: Interface view of dictionaries] scgmille@xxxxxx (28 Oct 2003 04:54 UTC)
Re: [oleg@pobox.com: Interface view of dictionaries] Bradd W. Szonye (28 Oct 2003 05:33 UTC)
Re: [oleg@pobox.com: Interface view of dictionaries] scgmille@xxxxxx (28 Oct 2003 14:10 UTC)
Re: [oleg@pobox.com: Interface view of dictionaries] scgmille@xxxxxx (28 Oct 2003 15:11 UTC)
Re: [oleg@pobox.com: Interface view of dictionaries] Bradd W. Szonye (28 Oct 2003 18:01 UTC)
Re: [oleg@pobox.com: Interface view of dictionaries] scgmille@xxxxxx (28 Oct 2003 18:29 UTC)
Re: [oleg@pobox.com: Interface view of dictionaries] Bradd W. Szonye (28 Oct 2003 19:05 UTC)
Re: [oleg@pobox.com: Interface view of dictionaries] scgmille@xxxxxx (28 Oct 2003 19:42 UTC)
Re: [oleg@pobox.com: Interface view of dictionaries] Bradd W. Szonye (28 Oct 2003 19:59 UTC)
Re: [oleg@pobox.com: Interface view of dictionaries] Tom Lord (28 Oct 2003 19:59 UTC)
Re: [oleg@pobox.com: Interface view of dictionaries] Tom Lord (28 Oct 2003 20:02 UTC)

Re: [oleg@pobox.com: Interface view of dictionaries] Tom Lord 28 Oct 2003 20:15 UTC


    > On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 10:00:59AM -0800, Bradd W. Szonye wrote:

    [criticism]

    > From: xxxxxx@freenetproject.org

    > Tough.  That is the only way you'll convince me of a flaw.  No
    > amount of positive proof through implementation is likely to
    > satisfy you.

That's obviously false, of course.   Your combative attitude does
nothing but discredit your SRFI.   Brad's criticisms appear to be
largely on the mark.

As I said, you obviously are not clueless about collections -- but you
are not quite "getting" the quality expectations that define what some
of us would consider to be "a good SRFI" rather than "one of the SRFIs
to disregard".

Reset the clock.   Withdraw.   You'll be joining the ranks of such
obvious losers (<sarcasm> there) as Clinger.

-t