Re: Nested syntax Taylor Campbell 18 Oct 2003 14:48 UTC
On Sunday, Oct 12, 2003, at 13:14 US/Eastern, Taylor Campbell wrote: > OK. I'll put this into the next draft, but this leads me to > want to change something: it seems like it would make more > sense for (...) to expand to literal ellipsis, (... ...) to > expand to (...), and so on for arbitrary lengths of lists of > ellipsis. What are some thoughts on this? I retract this now that the 'choose-your-own-ellipsis' device has been proposed, which I think is much better.