Re: reference implementation; multiple patterns after ellipsis Taylor Campbell
21 Oct 2003 19:16 UTC
[ And then I accidentally sent _this_ to _myself_ the first time... ]
Al* Petrofsky wrote:
>> Did you mean to respond only to me and not the list?
(The fact that I sent it at three in the morning might have something
to do with it.)
>> If you like scheme48's implementation, then you should extend it to
>> support SRFI-46. Then we'll have two independent implementations,
>> which is much better than one, even if neither is of practical use
>> with most scheme systems.
Hmm. I suppose I could try that.
>> No, a copy of the reference implementation (whatever it is) should be
>> stored with the SRFI.
I suppose so...