(Previous discussion continued)
Re: octothorpe array syntax; other comments Per Bothner 14 Nov 2003 20:59 UTC

Re: octothorpe array syntax; other comments Per Bothner 14 Nov 2003 20:59 UTC

bear wrote:

> #,(array
>   #( #( a0 a1 a2)
>      #( b0 b1 b2)
>      #( c0 c1 c2)))
>
> Is a better notation -- more general and extensible, and
> requires less special reader support.  No need to mention
> rank and size; those are implicitly given by the structure.

How would you handle 0*N arrays?
--
	--Per Bothner
xxxxxx@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/