(Previous discussion continued)
Re: SRFI-47 -- types and declarations. Felix Winkelmann 19 Dec 2003 08:08 UTC

Re: SRFI-47 -- types and declarations. Felix Winkelmann 19 Dec 2003 08:08 UTC

Am Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:49:09 +0100 hat Michael Sperber
<xxxxxx@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> geschrieben:

>>>>>> "Felix" == Felix Winkelmann <xxxxxx@proxima-mt.de> writes:
>
> Felix> Well, the "implementation" list is also not very up-to-date.
>
> Sure, we rely on the authors or others to tell us about supported SRFIs.
>
> Felix> So far PLT, Kawa, Guile, Chicken, Stklos and Gauche support
> SRFI-4,
> Felix> as will Gambit 4.0. That's quite a lot, IMHO.
>
> I'll note that Gambit 4.0 hasn't been out for quite a while, and that
> PLT doesn't support the aspect of SRFI 4 we're talking about (read
> syntax).
>

Oops, Gambit 3.0 already has support for it:

http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~gambit/doc/gambit-c_toc.html#TOC25

So, this is one of the more widely suported SRFI's, after all!

cheers,
felix