Making the new let easier to stomach sperber@xxxxxx (10 Feb 1999 14:15 UTC)
Re: Making the new let easier to stomach Andy Gaynor (11 Feb 1999 23:56 UTC)
Re: Making the new let easier to stomach sperber@xxxxxx (23 Feb 1999 10:54 UTC)
Re: Making the new let easier to stomach Andy Gaynor (24 Feb 1999 01:46 UTC)

Making the new let easier to stomach sperber@xxxxxx 10 Feb 1999 14:15 UTC

Hi Andy,

Many thanks for creating SRFI 5.  Two comments:

- You're essentially arguing for replacing R5RS let with the one you
  propose.  This is totally valid.

  As it SRFI, your proposal is still only a suggestion for an addition
  to the language.  Why not rename it to something other than let?
  This would also make it easier to use for people dealing with legacy
  code.

- Is there a way to define the construct using standard R5RS macros
  rather than explicit renaming (which is only supported by one or two
  Scheme systems)?

--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla