On Friday 13 February 2004 07:53 pm, Bradd W. Szonye wrote:

> That's why I recommended XML as an example to follow. It's probably the
> closest thing to a universally-accepted, multiple-encoding-friendly
> format there is, and it even uses a syntax vaguely similar to Scheme!

I still fail to see how people find <foo> ... <\foo> easier to read than
(foo ...).

The big parens seem much too ugly!  8^)  ;^)   8^)

Cheers,
-KenD