xxxxxx@autodrip.bloodandcoffee.net wrote:

>
>>Anyway, you haven't convinced me, and by repeating it endlessly and by
>>abusing your "_" key, you will not convince me in future. So I recommend
>>you change your strategy or simple accept that you can't do anything
>>about it, unless you try something new.
>
>
> Felix, I recommend that you just try to _understand_ the situation that
> you are _forcing_ Scheme into.  The way you have attempted to flip my
> argument around and use it against me demonstrates that you hardly
> understand it at all.
>

I'm totally aware that SRFI-7 is more general than SRFI-55, and could
(potentially) be implemented across all implementations. I do not (and
never did) claim the opposite. Yet, I find SRFI-7 suboptimal, for
various reasons I have already given (less typing (yes!), more
natural, more straightforward, more portable - across existing
implementations).

Unless you come up with something new, consider yourself ignored from
now on.

cheers,
felix