bytes vs. octets Alex Shinn (15 Sep 2004 09:01 UTC)
Re: bytes vs. octets bear (15 Sep 2004 16:26 UTC)
Re: bytes vs. octets Alex Shinn (16 Sep 2004 00:17 UTC)
Re: bytes vs. octets Thomas Bushnell BSG (15 Sep 2004 18:54 UTC)
Re: bytes vs. octets Alex Shinn (16 Sep 2004 00:28 UTC)
Re: bytes vs. octets Thomas Bushnell BSG (16 Sep 2004 01:01 UTC)
Re: bytes vs. octets Alex Shinn (16 Sep 2004 01:52 UTC)
Re: bytes vs. octets Thomas Bushnell BSG (16 Sep 2004 02:15 UTC)
Re: bytes vs. octets Per Bothner (16 Sep 2004 04:18 UTC)

Re: bytes vs. octets Alex Shinn 16 Sep 2004 01:52 UTC

At 15 Sep 2004 18:01:18 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
> So go ahead and name the functions whatever you want, after taking all
> factors into account.  But don't then back up your decision with the
> dishonest claim that your usage is "universally accepted".

You're right, I meant "universally understood."

--
Alex