SRFI 56 Binary I/O bear (17 Jun 2004 00:44 UTC)
Re: SRFI 56 Binary I/O Alex Shinn (17 Jun 2004 02:40 UTC)
Re: SRFI 56 Binary I/O tb@xxxxxx (17 Jun 2004 06:14 UTC)
Re: SRFI 56 Binary I/O bear (17 Jun 2004 09:06 UTC)
Re: SRFI 56 Binary I/O Alex Shinn (17 Jun 2004 10:17 UTC)
Re: SRFI 56 Binary I/O Shiro Kawai (17 Jun 2004 10:40 UTC)
Re: SRFI 56 Binary I/O tb@xxxxxx (17 Jun 2004 15:09 UTC)

Re: SRFI 56 Binary I/O tb@xxxxxx 17 Jun 2004 06:14 UTC

bear <xxxxxx@sonic.net> writes:

> 	read-byte
>       write-byte
>       peek-byte
>       byte-ready?

This is fine, but don't call them bytes.  Call them "octets" if that's
what you mean; since "byte" has a different meaning (however remote
these days) it would be well advised to use a word that means
specifically what you want, rather than one that only mostly does.

Thomas