On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Dale Jordan wrote:
> The pattern for the vector case of if-symbol? seems to be missing sk and fk.
Thank you. I'll correct this.
> You don't mention the anonymous selector and mutator syntax of previous
> versions posted on cls, but the implementation still supports them; I rather
> like them.
I was worried about overloading the record macro too much and thought I'd
simplify the specification. But if anyone
else would like to have these back, please speak up.
> An elaboration of match-let[*] seems to be missing.
Thanks, yes. I'll add it.
Cheers
Andre