>>>>> On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 20:16:05 -0400 (EDT), Aubrey Jaffer <xxxxxx@alum.mit.edu> said:

> SRFI-63 is intended to supersede SRFI-47.  Now that SRFI-63 is
> finalized, should SRFI-47 be withdrawn?

That was never the original intention of the SRFI process.  SRFI-47
should simply be marked as superseded by SRFI-63.

../Dave