Re: Please direct comments about SRFI 68 to the SRFI 68 mailing list
Marc Feeley 17 May 2005 13:55 UTC
On May 17, 2005, at 8:48 AM, Michael Sperber wrote:
>
> I appreciate your naming suggestions, but I'm not going to follow up
> on stuff about SRFI 68 on this list.
I'd like to point out that you were the first to violate this rule by
sending to the SRFI 66 mailing list **only** your request for name
suggestions for SRFI 68 procedures. I'm not willing to get dragged
into the SRFI 68 discussion before I have read and reread the proposal
carefully and have a coherent position (my current feeling though is
that SRFI 68 is overly complex).
Marc