Revision of SRFI 66 available Michael Sperber (18 Apr 2005 16:07 UTC)
If you like "u8vector" ... Michael Sperber (15 May 2005 13:15 UTC)
[srfi-66] List of bytes to byte-vector Jens Axel Søgaard (15 May 2005 18:14 UTC)
Re: If you like "u8vector" ... Thomas Bushnell BSG (15 May 2005 20:03 UTC)
Re: If you like "u8vector" ... Per Bothner (17 May 2005 04:19 UTC)
Re: If you like "u8vector" ... Michael Sperber (17 May 2005 19:35 UTC)
Re: If you like "u8vector" ... Per Bothner (17 May 2005 20:09 UTC)
Re: If you like "u8vector" ... Marc Feeley (17 May 2005 12:11 UTC)
Re: Please direct comments about SRFI 68 to the SRFI 68 mailing list Marc Feeley (17 May 2005 13:56 UTC)

Re: Please direct comments about SRFI 68 to the SRFI 68 mailing list Marc Feeley 17 May 2005 13:55 UTC

On May 17, 2005, at 8:48 AM, Michael Sperber wrote:

>
> I appreciate your naming suggestions, but I'm not going to follow up
> on stuff about SRFI 68 on this list.

I'd like to point out that you were the first to violate this rule by
sending to the SRFI 66 mailing list **only** your request for name
suggestions for SRFI 68 procedures.  I'm not willing to get dragged
into the SRFI 68 discussion before I have read and reread the proposal
carefully and have a coherent position (my current feeling though is
that SRFI 68 is overly complex).

Marc