Naming poll Michael Sperber (22 May 2005 10:04 UTC)
Re: Naming poll Thomas Bushnell BSG (23 May 2005 06:33 UTC)
Re: Naming poll Michael Sperber (23 May 2005 06:48 UTC)
Re: Naming poll David Van Horn (23 May 2005 13:21 UTC)
Re: Naming poll Bradd W. Szonye (23 May 2005 16:03 UTC)
Re: Naming poll Per Bothner (24 May 2005 01:10 UTC)
Re: Naming poll Marc Feeley (24 May 2005 01:32 UTC)
Re: Naming poll felix winkelmann (24 May 2005 06:39 UTC)

Re: Naming poll Thomas Bushnell BSG 23 May 2005 06:33 UTC

Michael Sperber <xxxxxx@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes:

> "u8": Replace "byte-vector" by "u8vector" and lone uccurrences of
>   "byte" to "u8" and "bytes" to "u8-some."
>
> Please vote on the list by following up on this message; a simple body
> consisting of "byte," "octet," or "u8" will suffice.

No, it won't.  My vote is as follows:

I *vastly* prefer either "u8" or "octet" to "byte."

I have a preference for "octet" over "u8", but it's not as strong.

And, if there are coherent actual live real honest-to-God and not
merely potential or possible proposals to have u16 or u32 or s8 or s16
or other such things, then I might well have no preference between
"octet" and "u8", or maybe a slight preference for "u8".

Thomas