Sebastian Egner wrote:
> Since we are having the same discussion for SRFI 68 as well ...

SRFI 64 also has non-final optional arguments.  E,g.:
(test-eqv [test-name] expected test-expr)

I think this is preferable to having two functions, and
in this case having the test-name first is desirable for
documentation reasons:

(test-eqv "test-string-apppend-1"
   (....)
   (....))
--
	--Per Bothner
xxxxxx@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/