arity of <? etc. Sven.Hartrumpf@xxxxxx (07 Apr 2005 07:16 UTC)
Re: arity of <? etc. Jens Axel Søgaard (07 Apr 2005 16:19 UTC)

Re: arity of <? etc. Jens Axel Søgaard 07 Apr 2005 16:19 UTC

xxxxxx@fernuni-hagen.de wrote:

> Hello.
>
> The SRFI talks about (<? compare-integer 0 x y), but the SRFI does not allow
> more than 2 objects to be compared in this way.  If this is correct, the "short
> evaluation" argument in section "Why are <? etc. procedures, not macros?"
> should be adjusted accordingly.

Well spotted. The example in the rationale should have been
(chain<? compare-integer 0 x y).

--
Jens Axel Søgaard