finishing output translating stream Shiro Kawai (25 May 2005 00:05 UTC)
Re: finishing output translating stream Michael Sperber (06 Jun 2005 15:15 UTC)
Re: finishing output translating stream Shiro Kawai (07 Jun 2005 10:41 UTC)
Re: finishing output translating stream bear (07 Jun 2005 16:12 UTC)
Re: finishing output translating stream Michael Sperber (08 Jun 2005 07:19 UTC)
Re: finishing output translating stream Shiro Kawai (08 Jun 2005 07:37 UTC)
Re: finishing output translating stream Michael Sperber (08 Jun 2005 07:52 UTC)
Re: finishing output translating stream Shiro Kawai (08 Jun 2005 09:08 UTC)
Re: finishing output translating stream Shiro Kawai (08 Jun 2005 09:10 UTC)
Re: finishing output translating stream bear (08 Jun 2005 18:10 UTC)
Re: finishing output translating stream bear (09 Jun 2005 02:16 UTC)
Re: finishing output translating stream Michael Sperber (09 Jun 2005 05:51 UTC)
Re: finishing output translating stream Shiro Kawai (21 Jun 2005 00:00 UTC)
Re: finishing output translating stream Michael Sperber (22 Jun 2005 07:56 UTC)

Re: finishing output translating stream bear 07 Jun 2005 16:12 UTC


On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Shiro Kawai wrote:

>From: Michael Sperber <xxxxxx@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
>Subject: Re: finishing output translating stream
>Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 17:15:57 +0200
>
>last few characters might be sitting in the character conversion
>buffer.
>
>But I might be able to achieve it by creating and closing a
>stream each time I want a complete "packet".  Though it
>seems to me lots of overhead, it may be doable.

The rational alternative is, of course, an explicit flush-stream
call.

				Bear