Specification vs. Implementation Alex Shinn (23 Aug 2005 02:49 UTC)
Re: Specification vs. Implementation Michael Sperber (23 Aug 2005 07:24 UTC)
Re: Specification vs. Implementation Alex Shinn (24 Aug 2005 02:48 UTC)
Re: Specification vs. Implementation Per Bothner (24 Aug 2005 04:27 UTC)
Re: Specification vs. Implementation Michael Sperber (24 Aug 2005 17:28 UTC)
Re: Specification vs. Implementation Michael Sperber (24 Aug 2005 17:45 UTC)

Re: Specification vs. Implementation Michael Sperber 23 Aug 2005 07:24 UTC

Alex Shinn <xxxxxx@gmail.com> writes:

> SRFI-68 provides an implementation as its specification.  The
> implementation is fully transparent, in that from a port object you can
> access the underlying stream, and from a stream you can access the
> underlying reader or writer primitive.

That was the case in the beginning, but I dropped transparency two
revisions ago, precisely because of what you argue.  Please check
again.  Is it better now?

--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla