Re: Lambda The Ultimate: use failure-thunk instead of default value?

Show/hide message thread

Lambda The Ultimate: use failure-thunk instead of default value? Tony Garnock-Jones (07 Jul 2005 09:58 UTC)

Re: Lambda The Ultimate: use failure-thunk instead of default value? Panu Kalliokoski (07 Jul 2005 12:25 UTC)

Re: Lambda The Ultimate: use failure-thunk instead of default value? Tony Garnock-Jones (07 Jul 2005 13:14 UTC)

Re: Lambda The Ultimate: use failure-thunk instead of default value? Panu A Kalliokoski (08 Jul 2005 14:19 UTC)

Re: Lambda The Ultimate: use failure-thunk instead of default value? Thien-Thi Nguyen (08 Jul 2005 06:21 UTC)

Re: Lambda The Ultimate: use failure-thunk instead of default value? Thien-Thi Nguyen 08 Jul 2005 06:21 UTC

Panu Kalliokoski <xxxxxx@sange.fi> writes:

> I'd like to hear more opinions on this.

i'm in favor of failure-thunk.
other interfaces can build on it easily.

thi