|
Wrapping up SRFI-70 Aubrey Jaffer (10 Aug 2005 03:16 UTC)
|
|
Re: Wrapping up SRFI-70
Bradley Lucier
(10 Aug 2005 03:31 UTC)
|
|
Re: Wrapping up SRFI-70
Per Bothner
(10 Aug 2005 05:13 UTC)
|
|
Re: Wrapping up SRFI-70
Aubrey Jaffer
(15 Aug 2005 02:18 UTC)
|
|
Re: Wrapping up SRFI-70
Per Bothner
(15 Aug 2005 16:38 UTC)
|
|
Re: Wrapping up SRFI-70
Aubrey Jaffer
(18 Aug 2005 01:58 UTC)
|
|
Re: Wrapping up SRFI-70
Per Bothner
(23 Aug 2005 00:24 UTC)
|
|
Re: Wrapping up SRFI-70
bear
(10 Aug 2005 05:38 UTC)
|
|
Re: Wrapping up SRFI-70
Aubrey Jaffer
(15 Aug 2005 03:45 UTC)
|
|
Re: Wrapping up SRFI-70
bear
(17 Aug 2005 03:06 UTC)
|
|
Re: Wrapping up SRFI-70
Paul Schlie
(17 Aug 2005 14:56 UTC)
|
|
Re: Wrapping up SRFI-70
bear
(17 Aug 2005 17:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: Wrapping up SRFI-70
Aubrey Jaffer
(19 Aug 2005 01:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: Wrapping up SRFI-70
bear
(19 Aug 2005 18:28 UTC)
|
Its time to wrap up SRFI-70. As with my other SRFIs, the Issues section generates no discussion, even though it has the issues I consider unsettled. Given the vagueness of the term "flonum", the section 6.2.3 paragraphs giving requirements for systems with flonums are not dangerous in terms of preventing interesting implementations; and SRFI-70 doesn't change them. It would be nice to improve it; but converting exact to inexact is a thorny problem.
