Re: comparison operators and *typos
Jens Axel Søgaard 30 Jun 2005 00:25 UTC
Aubrey Jaffer wrote:
> Hmm... "Concrete Mathematics" p.162 (R. Graham, D. Knuth,
> O. Patashnik) argues that 0^0=1 for the sake of the binomial
> theorem. I will change SRFI-70 to return 1 for 0^0.
Other reasons for setting 0^0=1 can be found in the Math FAQ.
<http://db.uwaterloo.ca/~alopez-o/math-faq/node40.html#SECTION00530000000000000000>
PS: You got a love the quote on the front page:
"Graphic Browsers such as Mosaic or Netscape should browse the Table of Contents."
<http://db.uwaterloo.ca/~alopez-o/math-faq/math-faq.html>
--
Jens Axel Søgaard