Opaque syntax objects

Show/hide message thread

Opaque syntax objects Michael Sperber (12 Aug 2005 15:18 UTC)

Re: Opaque syntax objects felix winkelmann (12 Aug 2005 20:22 UTC)

Re: Opaque syntax objects Jens Axel Søgaard (12 Aug 2005 23:20 UTC)

Re: Opaque syntax objects Andre van Tonder (13 Aug 2005 00:25 UTC)

Re: Opaque syntax objects Michael Sperber (13 Aug 2005 07:46 UTC)

Re: Opaque syntax objects Jens Axel Søgaard (14 Aug 2005 19:45 UTC)

Re: Opaque syntax objects Andre van Tonder (14 Aug 2005 20:22 UTC)

Re: Opaque syntax objects bear (14 Aug 2005 17:48 UTC)

Re: Opaque syntax objects Keith Wright (13 Aug 2005 07:31 UTC)

Re: Opaque syntax objects Michael Sperber (13 Aug 2005 12:33 UTC)

Re: Opaque syntax objects Jens Axel Søgaard (14 Aug 2005 20:27 UTC)

Opaque syntax objects Michael Sperber 12 Aug 2005 15:17 UTC

The issue has come up in the discussion, but hasn't really been in the
focus yet:

I'd like to suggest that compound expressions be represented by an
opaque type rather than by pairs.  This would ensure a modicum of
abstraction, and would *really* make comprehensive the ability of all
syntax objects to carry location information.  I've come to appreciate
this added layer of abstraction in PLT Scheme.

--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, VÃ¶lkerverstÃ¤ndigung und Ã¼berhaupt blabla