Keith Wright wrote:

 > Hidden away in the reference implementation, and in
 > an unannounced SRFI are the keywords
 >   (begin-for-syntax ...)
 > and
 >   (begin-for-import ...).
 >
 > These are part of the module system, but I think they should be
 > part of the macro system (srfi-72).

 Yes, I have been thinking about including begin-for-syntax,
 but I first would like to understand it better.

 By the way, the current module system is deprecated while I am
 rethinking some of the phase separation issues.

 Cheers
 Andre