Re: Surrogates and character representation
John.Cowan 24 Jul 2005 22:12 UTC
Alan Watson scripsit:
> Hmm. That would seem to prevent an implementation representing strings
> internally using UTF-8. This is convenient in some contexts as Scheme
> strings can be trivially converted to UTF-8 C strings.
Not at all. There is a well-defined UTF-8 encoding for every Unicode
code point (which is not the case for UTF-16). See Table 3-6 in
the Unicode Standard 4.0.
--
Here lies the Christian, John Cowan
judge, and poet Peter, http://www.reutershealth.com
Who broke the laws of God http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
and man and metre. xxxxxx@reutershealth.com