On 7/18/05, Thomas Lord <xxxxxx@emf.net> wrote:
>
>      It has never been great style in Scheme, even if strictly portable, to
> write programs which assume that string->symbol and symbol->string define a
> 1:1 relationship between the two types.
>

I'm probably missing something obvious, but this strikes me as quite
nonsensical.
Could you elaborate?

cheers,
felix