|
case mappings
Alex Shinn
(13 Jul 2005 03:57 UTC)
|
|
Re: case mappings
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(13 Jul 2005 05:49 UTC)
|
|
Re: case mappings
Michael Sperber
(13 Jul 2005 06:41 UTC)
|
|
Re: case mappings
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(13 Jul 2005 06:47 UTC)
|
|
Re: case mappings
Michael Sperber
(13 Jul 2005 07:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: case mappings
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(13 Jul 2005 07:21 UTC)
|
|
Re: case mappings
bear
(13 Jul 2005 17:24 UTC)
|
|
Re: case mappings
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(13 Jul 2005 19:35 UTC)
|
|
Re: case mappings
Alex Shinn
(13 Jul 2005 07:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: case mappings
Alex Shinn
(13 Jul 2005 07:40 UTC)
|
|
Re: case mappings Thomas Bushnell BSG (13 Jul 2005 19:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: case mappings
Alex Shinn
(14 Jul 2005 02:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: case mappings
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(14 Jul 2005 07:15 UTC)
|
|
Re: case mappings
Alex Shinn
(14 Jul 2005 07:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: case mappings
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(14 Jul 2005 08:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: case mappings
Alex Shinn
(14 Jul 2005 08:24 UTC)
|
|
Re: case mappings
bear
(14 Jul 2005 16:47 UTC)
|
|
Re: case mappings
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(14 Jul 2005 20:29 UTC)
|
|
Re: case mappings
bear
(15 Jul 2005 18:23 UTC)
|
|
Re: case mappings
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(15 Jul 2005 19:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: case mappings
Matthew Flatt
(13 Jul 2005 13:05 UTC)
|
|
Re: case mappings
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(13 Jul 2005 19:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: case mappings
Alex Shinn
(14 Jul 2005 02:31 UTC)
|
Re: case mappings Thomas Bushnell BSG 13 Jul 2005 19:36 UTC
Alex Shinn <xxxxxx@gmail.com> writes: > The idea of ASCII-only mappings was suggested for the simple fact > that they are well-defined, and required for many computer formats and > protocols. If R6RS doesn't provide them, every Scheme will in some > form or another, so it's better to standardize them. Call them > ascii-char-ci=? etc. if the specificity bothers you. Actually, if you know the characters are ASCII, then the local-independent Unicode rules *will* correctly do ASCII case mapping. So why do you need special ASCII functions?