Re: on waste-of-time arguments....
John.Cowan 20 Jul 2005 05:03 UTC
Thomas Bushnell BSG scripsit:
> I think you have it backwards. 7.1 is not the normative section, 2.1
> is.
So the formal stuff in section 7 is non-normative, and the informal stuff
in sections 1-6 is normative? I find that surprising, though not absolutely
astonishing. In particular, that means that a mismatch between the number
of actual and formal parameters is allowed, as is + applied to a non-number
and CAR to a non-pair? These things are only forbidden in 7.2.
--
John Cowan xxxxxx@reutershealth.com http://www.reutershealth.com
"Not to know The Smiths is not to know K.X.U." --K.X.U.