|
Re: the discussion so far
John.Cowan
(17 Jul 2005 07:29 UTC)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
Re: the discussion so far
John.Cowan
(20 Jul 2005 05:07 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: the discussion so far
bear
(20 Jul 2005 17:27 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: the discussion so far
John.Cowan
(20 Jul 2005 19:28 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: the discussion so far
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(20 Jul 2005 19:30 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: the discussion so far John.Cowan (20 Jul 2005 19:41 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: the discussion so far
bear
(20 Jul 2005 23:56 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: the discussion so far
Alex Shinn
(21 Jul 2005 01:36 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: the discussion so far
John.Cowan
(21 Jul 2005 01:47 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: the discussion so far
bear
(21 Jul 2005 08:52 UTC)
|
||
Thomas Bushnell BSG scripsit:
> My only quibble (and it is minor minor minor) is that "UCA" might well
> be an opaque term to many reading the standard. How about
> "human-readable" or some other tag instead?
"tailorable" might be a good tag; UCA provides a default collation but
also a mechanism for adding specific tailorings.
--
John Cowan xxxxxx@reutershealth.com www.reutershealth.com www.ccil.org/~cowan
The known is finite, the unknown infinite; intellectually we stand
on an islet in the midst of an illimitable ocean of inexplicability.
Our business in every generation is to reclaim a little more land,
to add something to the extent and the solidity of our possessions.
--Thomas Henry Huxley