Re: the discussion so far
John.Cowan
(17 Jul 2005 07:29 UTC)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
Re: the discussion so far
John.Cowan
(20 Jul 2005 05:07 UTC)
|
||
Re: the discussion so far
bear
(20 Jul 2005 17:27 UTC)
|
||
Re: the discussion so far
John.Cowan
(20 Jul 2005 19:28 UTC)
|
||
Re: the discussion so far
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(20 Jul 2005 19:30 UTC)
|
||
Re: the discussion so far John.Cowan (20 Jul 2005 19:41 UTC)
|
||
Re: the discussion so far
bear
(20 Jul 2005 23:56 UTC)
|
||
Re: the discussion so far
Alex Shinn
(21 Jul 2005 01:36 UTC)
|
||
Re: the discussion so far
John.Cowan
(21 Jul 2005 01:47 UTC)
|
||
Re: the discussion so far
bear
(21 Jul 2005 08:52 UTC)
|
Thomas Bushnell BSG scripsit: > My only quibble (and it is minor minor minor) is that "UCA" might well > be an opaque term to many reading the standard. How about > "human-readable" or some other tag instead? "tailorable" might be a good tag; UCA provides a default collation but also a mechanism for adding specific tailorings. -- John Cowan xxxxxx@reutershealth.com www.reutershealth.com www.ccil.org/~cowan The known is finite, the unknown infinite; intellectually we stand on an islet in the midst of an illimitable ocean of inexplicability. Our business in every generation is to reclaim a little more land, to add something to the extent and the solidity of our possessions. --Thomas Henry Huxley