Re: the discussion so far
John.Cowan
(17 Jul 2005 07:29 UTC)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
Re: the discussion so far
John.Cowan
(20 Jul 2005 05:07 UTC)
|
||
Re: the discussion so far
bear
(20 Jul 2005 17:27 UTC)
|
||
Re: the discussion so far
John.Cowan
(20 Jul 2005 19:28 UTC)
|
||
Re: the discussion so far
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(20 Jul 2005 19:30 UTC)
|
||
Re: the discussion so far
John.Cowan
(20 Jul 2005 19:41 UTC)
|
||
Re: the discussion so far
bear
(20 Jul 2005 23:56 UTC)
|
||
Re: the discussion so far
Alex Shinn
(21 Jul 2005 01:36 UTC)
|
||
Re: the discussion so far
John.Cowan
(21 Jul 2005 01:47 UTC)
|
||
Re: the discussion so far bear (21 Jul 2005 08:52 UTC)
|
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Alex Shinn wrote: >On 7/21/05, bear <xxxxxx@sonic.net> wrote: >> >> Finally, I suggest two additional functions: >> >> (set-current-locale! str) >[...] >> (current-locale) > > These procedures are fine but I think all locale-specific procedures > should also take an optional locale argument which defaults to > (current-locale). This is more general and is the natural way to do > things in a server or other multi-user environment where you are not > producing output for the current process' user, but for an arbitrary > locale associated with another entity. good point. Bear