Richard Kelsey <xxxxxx@s48.org> writes:

>    From: Michael Sperber <xxxxxx@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
>    Cc: srfi-76@srfi.schemers.org
>
>    Richard Kelsey <xxxxxx@s48.org> writes:
>
>    > In some particular order?
>
>    No---at least the current draft doesn't specify one, keeping with
>    Scheme's tradition here.
>
> Actually, it does give an order.  "Parent init expressions, if any,
> are evaluated before child init expressions."

Yes, but there's no order specified within, I think.

> It depends on whether or not the 'init' expressions count
> as initializing the records.

Yes.  And every field has a defined <init expression>, whether
implicit or explicit.

> By the way, in what context are the <constructor argument>s in
>
>   (parent <parent name> <constructor argument> *)
>
> evaluated?  Specifically, do they have any access to the values
> passed to the subtype constructor?

Not directly, no.  The context is that of the <formals> list.  I guess
this should be clarified.

--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla