Donovan Kolbly <xxxxxx@rscheme.org> writes:
> Is there established terminology for portions of SRFIs that are
> optional?
No. We really need more infrastructure to talk about these things.
(The same problem has shown up with SRFI 68.) We're working on it.
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla