Re: Optional features | Simplelists

opaque record types Richard Kelsey (18 Sep 2005 14:34 UTC)

Re: opaque record types Michael Sperber (20 Sep 2005 10:34 UTC)

Re: opaque record types Richard Kelsey (20 Sep 2005 15:17 UTC)

Re: opaque record types Michael Sperber (20 Sep 2005 16:01 UTC)

Optional features [was Re: opaque record types] Donovan Kolbly (20 Sep 2005 20:25 UTC)

Re: Optional features Michael Sperber (21 Sep 2005 06:36 UTC)

Re: Optional features Michael Sperber 21 Sep 2005 06:36 UTC

Donovan Kolbly <xxxxxx@rscheme.org> writes:

> Is there established terminology for portions of SRFIs that are
> optional?

No.  We really need more infrastructure to talk about these things.
(The same problem has shown up with SRFI 68.)  We're working on it.

--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, VÃ¶lkerverstÃ¤ndigung und Ã¼berhaupt blabla