Andre van Tonder <xxxxxx@now.het.brown.edu> writes:

> Again, I am not suggesting adding functional update [...]

Yet you are making a compelling case for it.  What's less clear to me
is why you seem to insist this should be done through the reflection
API (and thus be limited to non-opaque record types, among other
limitations)---after all, accessors, mutators, and constructors aren't
either.

--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla