Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Alan Watson <xxxxxx@astrosmo.unam.mx> writes:
>
>
>>NaNs are atoms -- they have no context or stucture, just a single value.
>>With the understandable exception of the eof object (and as has been
>>noted, this is exception is not universal), Lisps and Schemes
>>tranditionally provide read syntax for atoms. So, tradition suggests
>>that we should have a read syntax for NaNs.
>
>
> Hogwash.  Procedures are atoms.

Wrong.  Closures can be modified.
--
	--Per Bothner
xxxxxx@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/