bear wrote:
> So I think that what we have here is motivated by one
> problem -- implementations that don't provide the full
> numeric tower -- proposes a minimum ground on which to
> solve it, and provides the solution given that minimum
> ground.  There is no reason once the solution is in
> place to leave that ground exposed.

I agree.

I applaud the authors of SRFI-77 for providing the tools to solve an
important problem (implementing the full tower). However, once they've
solved the problem, I'd like them to put their tools away tidily.

Regards,

Alan
--
Dr Alan Watson
Centro de Radioastronomía y Astrofísica
Universidad Astronómico Nacional de México