Re: Integer residue-classes William D Clinger (22 Feb 2006 22:44 UTC)
Re: Integer residue-classes Michael Sperber (26 Feb 2006 14:57 UTC)
Re: Integer residue-classes John Cowan (26 Feb 2006 15:52 UTC)
Re: Integer residue-classes Paul Schlie (26 Feb 2006 16:58 UTC)
Re: Integer residue-classes Paul Schlie (05 Mar 2006 18:52 UTC)
Re: Integer residue-classes Paul Schlie (12 Mar 2006 15:29 UTC)
miscellaneous request Paul Schlie (12 Mar 2006 15:47 UTC)
miscellaneous request (last one) Paul Schlie (12 Mar 2006 17:27 UTC)

Re: Integer residue-classes John Cowan 26 Feb 2006 15:52 UTC

Michael Sperber scripsit:

> So I can't fault your argument, but I really am not sure which version
> (DIV+MOD which switches behavior depending on the second argument, or
> separate DIV+MOD and QUO+REM) would be easier to remember or less
> confusing.  It would help, if more people on this list could chime in.

Now that the question is verbal rather than mathematical, I feel
competent to comment: I prefer the separate functions and the names
DIV+, MOD+, DIV-, and MOD-.

--
We pledge allegiance to the penguin             John Cowan
and to the intellectual property regime         xxxxxx@ccil.org
for which he stands, one world under            http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Linux, with free music and open source          http://www.ap.org
software for all.               --Julian Dibbell on Brazil, edited