Re: numerical conditioning MAGNITUDE and / William D Clinger (21 Jun 2006 13:29 UTC)
Re: numerical conditioning MAGNITUDE and / John Cowan (21 Jun 2006 13:38 UTC)
Re: numerical conditioning MAGNITUDE and / Aubrey Jaffer (21 Jun 2006 17:32 UTC)

Re: numerical conditioning MAGNITUDE and / John Cowan 21 Jun 2006 13:37 UTC

William D Clinger scripsit:

> No.  Neither mandates that inexact reals be represented as
> binary floating point, or that inexact reals follow the IEEE
> standards for binary floating point, or that implementations
> of the standard procedures be of high quality.

This leads me to the question of how a system can comply with this
SRFI if it has neither flonum hardware nor the space for flonum
emulation.  AFAICT the minimum set of flonums required by the
SRFI is {0.0}.

--
John Cowan    xxxxxx@ccil.org    http://ccil.org/~cowan
        Sound change operates regularly to produce irregularities;
        analogy operates irregularly to produce regularities.
                --E.H. Sturtevant, ca. 1945, probably at Yale